An an elegant experiment performed by the Chinese published in Physical Review Letters (DOI: 10.1103/93zb-lws3, December 2025) realizes a long-standing thought experiment (gedankenexperiment) from the 1927 Solvay Conference debates between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr based on Werner Heisenberg‘s Uncertainty Principle.

 

the Chinese experiment uses a single ultracold rubidium atom (cooled to its motional ground state in an optical tweezer) as a tunable, recoiling "slit" or beam splitter in an interferometer setup with photons. The atom's extremely low momentum uncertainty (comparable to a single photon's) allows detection of the photon's recoil momentum, which effectively provides "which-way" information about the photon's path.

 

Key result:

When the setup reveals precise which-way (path) information via the atom's recoil, the interference pattern (wave-like behavior) disappears or is tunable/erasable. This confirms Bohr's complementarity principle—you cannot simultaneously have full particle-like (definite path) and full wave-like (interference) behavior in quantum systems based on Heisenberg’s foundational Uncertainty Principle. It supports the inherent indeterminism and trade-off in quantum mechanics, directly tied to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (position and momentum cannot both be known precisely at the same time). The experiment backs Hesenberg-Bohr's side of the historical debate and shows quantum weirdness holds even at this refined, quantum-limit implementation of Einstein's proposed test.

​

Einstein's famous statement—" (their the Jewish) god does not play dice with the universe" (from letters in 1926–1927, e.g., to Max Born)—expressed his philosophical objection to quantum mechanics' probabilistic, inherently random nature. He believed the universe should be fully deterministic and causal, with no fundamental chance or "dice-rolling" at its core. Some interpretations link this to the Jewish Spinozistic deterministic view of divinity.

​

Traditional Judaism (especially in prophetic and rabbinic sources) often portrays thier god as sovereign over history and nature in a purposeful, non-random way—a deterministic view (e.g., divine providence governing all) and as ‘revealed” in Jewish “prophecy”. Einstein's "no dice" stance aligns with a deterministic Jewish world view than with accepting irreducible randomness, but he avoided frame it directly as Jewish prophecy and theology.

​

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (1927) formalized the randomness Einstein disliked, showing quantum events are not just practically unknowable but fundamentally probabilistic.

(see also https://henadology.wordpress.com/philosophy)

 

The Germanic concept of Wyrd (from Anglo-Saxon/Old Norse traditions) refers to destiny as an impersonal, woven web of events—inexorable, often inexplicitly tied to chance or randomness, but as a “web”, intertwined, “entanglement” or involvement in a complex situation outcome.

 

It contrasts with Einstein's hoped-for strict determinism (predictable from initial conditions without probability) and aligns somewhat more with quantum indeterminism (outcomes not fully fixed by prior states, though Wyrd lacks the probabilistic math of QM).

 

Overall alignment:

• The experiment contradicts Einstein's deterministic hope (and his intuition that his Levite-Jewish “god” doesn't "play dice") by empirically upholding what was understood by Heisenberg/Bohr’s description quantum indeterminism and complementarity.

• It does not align with Einstein's view of a fully deterministic reality.

• For Levite-Judaism's god (as deterministic sovereign), it challenges strict determinism but doesn't directly refute the divine (QM randomness could still fit within a larger divine framework in some theological views, see https://henadology.wordpress.com/philosophy/).

• It leans more toward the uncertainty/randomness side (like aspects of the Web of Wyrd's inexorable yet non-fully-predictable “web of entanglements”) than Einstein's classical determinism.​

 

In short: The result sides with Heisenberg/Bohr over Einstein on the "dice" question—quantum reality includes fundamental uncertainty, not the strict determinism Einstein, the Levites and Jews prefer.

​​

​